A response from Chris (and an insult)

Hi again,

In response to your comments on you website:

The explanation you provide for encouraging “meatarianism” is even more contradictory than I thought. It is clear that you don’t understand the simple laws of supply and demand.

Eating animals will only increase the demand for animals to be raised for food, further contributing to vegetable cruelty. On the contrary, not eating animals will erase the demand for that animal to be born, raised, eat plants, and be slaughtered.

I can understand that a severe lack of intelligence leads to short term thinking, but please try to think beyond your usual train of thought.

Sincerely,

Chris

Chris, thank you for calling everyone involved in the Vegetable Rights Militant Movement and other cruelty free lifestyles unintelligent. You are clearly our superior.

Since I am a mental midget, no doubt due to only eating meat in an attempt to protect those who cannot protect themselves, I will merely point out that your evil plan would eliminate several species of animal altogether.

While I am not entirely opposed to this idea, since herbivores are the worst offenders on the VRMM’s list of cruel entities, I can’t help but wonder if that is what you meant. Is it?

Did you really intend for me and my fellow meatatarians to interpret “not eating animals will erase the demand for that animal to be born” as a desirable thing from your point of view?

I doubt it. But then again, I’m the idiot here.

What would my fellow idiot meatatarians say to Mr. Genius Chris?

Oct 22 2009 03:15 pm | commentary |

Leave a Reply